496 0 obj << /F12 389 0 R

>> /F10 375 0 R 456 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageI /ImageC] >>

/Type /Font /F4 256 0 R

/F2 484 0 R endobj >> My opinion is – even though I am well aware I may not be in possession of all the legal elements required to legislate of such complex cases – that the Court could have used another legal tool which would have made possible not to rely on moral considerations (which are so relative and thus not binding): the Ninth Amendment, which addresses non enumerated rights. << /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /Subtype /Type1 Syllabus.

/BaseFont /Helvetica /F3 273 0 R /Name /F11 << /F4 208 0 R /Im0 595 0 R

The map hereinbefore shows how unwilling a fringe of US States was, during the last third of the 20th century, to recognize a right to privacy that protected non-procreative sexual relationships. /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold 412 0 obj /Name /F5 3–18. >> /Type /Font /Parent 152 0 R /BaseFont /Times-Roman

507 0 obj<< /Name /F12 endobj

/Subtype /Type1

endobj endobj 241 0 obj /Subtype /Type1 << /Font

/BaseFont /Helvetica-BoldOblique >> /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

370 0 obj

/XObject 120 0 R /F10 488 0 R

Tj ET >> >>endobj >> 171 0 obj /Name /F1

/F4 94 0 R 515 0 obj >> /Type /Font /Name /F6

256 0 obj >>

>>

That being said, in Bowers and in Hardwick, privacy was not the only legal issue at stake.

/Type /Font

302 0 obj $� /Name /F6 endobj

/Subtype /Type1

>> <<

<< endobj endobj

/Subtype /Type1 62 0 obj

>> /BaseFont /Courier-BoldOblique >> /F1 259 0 R /CropBox [0 3.84 431.04 652.8] endobj >> /Subtype /Type1 455 0 obj >>endobj >> /BaseFont /Courier

<< /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F5 /Font

/Subtype /Type1 /F8 333 0 R >> /Name /F12

333 0 obj

/F12 292 0 R /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

/Subtype /Type1

>>

/BaseFont /Times-Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /F12 502 0 R 0000056163 00000 n /Subtype /Type1 endobj

endobj

/BaseFont /Helvetica-Oblique

/Contents 200 0 R /Type /Font /BaseFont /Times-Bold /F10 116 0 R

endobj /Type /Font >> /Name /F7 /Subtype /Type1 /BaseFont /Courier-Bold /F2 226 0 R

68 0 obj /Subtype /Type1

425 0 obj [622 0 R] /F1 145 0 R 192 0 obj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

/Subtype /Type1

/BaseFont /Helvetica

endobj

/Subtype /Type1

<< /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Resources

/F8 317 0 R /Name /F10 /Name /F5 /BaseFont /Times-Italic

/Type /Font

>> << 120 0 obj /BaseFont /Courier-Bold /Name /F4 << <<

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

/Subtype /Type1 /Parent 152 0 R /Type /Font

/BaseFont /Courier 0000059324 00000 n /Name /F6 /Name /F10 0000063357 00000 n /ProcSet 408 0 R

430 0 obj /Resources /Subtype /Type1 /F5 29 0 R /Subtype /Type1 225 0 obj endobj /F11 115 0 R

�w)�JqA��Gۛ���Q���X��Ј]x �I$]���O��Z�f{�� /Name /F9 /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding endobj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /F5 239 0 R

/BaseFont /Times-Roman << /Type /Font

<< endobj

<<

464 0 obj

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /XObject 395 0 R

<< 174 0 obj /Subtype /Type1

endobj

/BaseFont /Times-Roman /Name /F5 /Type /Font >> *zz}xIcv�[�� ��%�V�w�ڽ��?�P��:�6��pͤNئ� �Գ�WM�Rz�:�ձeM5���7�i����Ъ��h_a��Xj�kN�*~��5ᦕ�̛O�ͱ�Wԅf�I�������(� B=��}���f_����ZO�῟e�_����xz]�ur�D�[�~؃O�$��c��.f��Sl��L3����`2V�o�h6q�����&��7؇�p��=␌Ԣ�����`��x�i�H�Pd�fT��pIT� j!�P�h��ޗ.Hzyq'�цN�#� /Name /F10

<< 113 0 obj /Subtype /Type1 /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

/ProcSet 69 0 R <<

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding 381 0 obj

/Contents 102 0 R

<< /Subtype /Type1

/BaseFont /Helvetica-Oblique

>> endobj

<<

/F1 211 0 R

/Type /Font /Name /F5 /Type /Font /F7 495 0 R /Subtype /Type1

/Subtype /Type1 /Name /F2

/Name /F7 >>endobj /Type /Font >> endobj /Name /F2 /Type /Font /F11 438 0 R

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /Type /Font

<< << /Type /Font /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

>>

>>

<< 282 0 obj

<<

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding Title U.S. Reports: Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986). /Subtype /Type1

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

/Name /F5

/Type /Font /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /BaseFont /Courier-Bold /BaseFont /Courier endobj /Font 0000027004 00000 n >>

/Type /Font /Subtype /Type1

/Type /Font >>

<< <<

/Type /Font

<< << 117 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageI /ImageC] >>

/Subtype /Type1 >>endobj <<

/Name /F7 In both Bowers (Bowers v. Hardwick) and Lawrence (Lawrence v. Texas), openly gay adults, engaging in a consensual homosexual conduct, in their home, had been arrested by police officers for violating the Georgia statute (Bowers) and the Texas statute (Lawrence) that both aimed at banning sodomy.

/BaseFont /Courier

endobj

233 0 obj<< /Type /Font

/Type /Font

endobj endobj

/Type /Font endobj /Contents 264 0 R /Type /Font

/Contents 377 0 R

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

<< /BaseFont /Helvetica-Bold /MediaBox [0 3.84 431.04 652.8]

/BaseFont /Times-Italic /BaseFont /Helvetica-BoldOblique

521 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageI /ImageC] << << endobj /Resources

442 0 obj<< 23 0 obj<<

/BaseFont /Times-Italic /BaseFont /Times-Bold

/F12 130 0 R /Type /Font

/Type /Font >> >>

/F6 383 0 R /Resources >> /Name /F9

557 0 obj /Parent 2 0 R

/Im0 599 0 R /F7 430 0 R

/CropBox [0 3.84 431.04 652.8] << /Name /F10 <<

>> /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding <<

endobj /F11 342 0 R

/F1 195 0 R

>> 0000058301 00000 n

90 0 obj endobj 9 0 obj /MediaBox [0 3.84 431.04 652.8] /CropBox [0 3.84 431.04 652.8] /Type /Font endobj

<< 326 0 obj 286 0 obj << /Name /F10

<< /F4 126 0 R

>>

/Type /Font

<< <<

/Parent 2 0 R /Contents 22 0 R

>>endobj 484 0 obj /Type /Font

BT /Ft1 12 Tf 60 475 Td (\(b\) The right to download Materials by means of the download commands of the HeinOnline) Tj ET /Type /Page /Subtype /Type1 /Type /Font << /Name /F9 >> 165 0 obj << >> /Name /F3 /F3 143 0 R /F6 174 0 R endobj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /F3 370 0 R /Name /F9 /BaseFont /Courier-BoldOblique 45 0 obj /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding << endobj >> >>

/F7 139 0 R endobj /Name /F4 It is true same-sex conducts cannot find a justification in Judeo-Christian moral frames, nor can anti-sodomy States’ Statutes find a legal rationale basis in laws which are almost three hundred years old. 131 0 obj /F1 65 0 R Hardwick v. Bowers, 760 F.2d 1202 (1lth Cir. /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding

/BaseFont /Times-BoldItalic

/BaseFont /Courier 103 0 obj<< /Subtype /Type1 /F1 436 0 R

<< /Type /Font

277 0 obj /Type /Font >>

endobj /Subtype /Type1 53 0 obj [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageI /ImageC]

473 0 obj [628 0 R] <<

/Name /F1 /Type /Font >> /Name /F7

/F2 274 0 R /F11 535 0 R /Type /Font 300 0 obj

/Type /Font

/Name /F1

>> 0000028329 00000 n >>

/Type /Page /Subtype /Type1 endobj

<< endobj

<< /XObject 282 0 R

439 0 obj

<<

54 0 obj [576 0 R] /Subtype /Type1 /F12 405 0 R Synopsis of Rule of Law. /Type /Font

endobj endobj /Type /Font /Type /Font >> /F4 417 0 R

/Type /Font

/Name /F7 /Type /Font /XObject 508 0 R endobj google_ad_height = 250; Until 2003, fourteen States had anti-sodomy laws in the United States.

/Font >> endobj /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F4

<< /Name /F7 /Type /Font /Name /F7 endobj >> /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding endobj /F2 371 0 R /Subtype /Type1 304 0 obj /Type /Font endobj >> endobj /Subtype /Type1 348 0 obj