Four years later the case of Gregg v. Georgia (1976) reached the Court.

Gregg v. Georgia held that Georgia's death penalty statute was constitutional. Gregg challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, claiming that his capital sentence was a "cruel and unusual" punishment that violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. At the The state Supreme Court affirmed the sentence for the murder conviction and Gregg appealed.

Troy Gregg, after being convicted in the lower Georgia Courts and sentenced to death, appealed his case to the Supreme Court. Troy Gregg did so on the grounds that the death penalty is in fact “cruel and unusual” punishment and therefore direct violation of the 8th and 14th amendment. Argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae, By appointment of the Court, argued the cause for the petitioner, for the State of California, as amicus curiae.

On appeal, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the death sentence except as to its imposition for the robbery conviction.

Troy Gregg had been found guilty of murder and armed robbery and sentenced to death.

On appeal, the Georgia Supreme Court affirmed the death sentence except as to its imposition for the robbery conviction. Moreover, the Court was not prepared to overrule the Georgia legislature's finding that capital punishment serves as a useful deterrent to future capital crimes and an appropriate means of social retribution against its most serious offenders. Is the imposition of the death sentence prohibited under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments as "cruel and unusual" punishment? William E. James for the State of California, as amicus curiae Facts of the case A jury found Gregg guilty of armed robbery and murder and sentenced him to death.

Gregg claimed the sentence violated the Eighth and 14th Amendment of the Constitution. GREGG v. GEORGIA(1976) No. Gregg v. Georgia Case Brief - Rule of Law: Capital punishment does not violate the Eighth or Fourteenth amendments of the United States Constitution provided it Facts. U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Gregg v. Georgia —which involved a prosecution for a double murder committed in the course of a robbery—rejected the legal argument that capital punishment in and of itself constituted "cruel and unusual punishment" and thus violated the … He asked the Court to go further than it had in the Furman case, and rule the death penalty itself unconstitutional. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 US 153 (1976) was the Supreme Court case which established that the death penalty, as long as it is applied appropriately, is constitutional and does not violate the 8th and 14thamendment. The Court claimed the statute did not constitute a "cruel and unusual" punishment and therefore did not violate the Eighth and Fourteenth amendments. Gregg was convicted of murder and sentenced to the death penalty under a Georgia state statute. In a 7-to-2 decision, the Court held that a punishment of death did not violate the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments under all circumstances.

A jury found Gregg guilty of armed robbery and murder and sentenced him to death. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (1976) Gregg v. Georgia No. In extreme criminal cases, such as when a defendant has been convicted of deliberately killing another, the careful and judicious use of the death penalty may be appropriate if carefully employed. No. Afte…

Georgia's death penalty statute assures the judicious and careful use of the death penalty by requiring a bifurcated proceeding where the trial and sentencing are conducted separately, specific jury findings as to the severity of the crime and the nature of the defendant, and a comparison of each capital sentence's circumstances with other similar cases. 74-6257 Argued: March 31, 1976 Decided: July 2, 1976 Petitioner was charged with committing armed robbery and murder on the basis of evidence that he had killed and robbed two men.

74-6257 Argued March 31, 1976 Decided July 2, 1976 428 U.S. 153 Syllabus Petitioner was charged with committing armed robbery and murder on the basis of evidence This case is one of the five "Death Penalty Cases" along with Jurek v. Texas , Roberts v. Louisiana , Proffitt v. Florida , and Woodson v. North Carolina .