The last week’s question was: if any project was losing all possible success characters but kept only one of them that obliged you to still call it “successful” , what would it be??. But generally speaking, this book is very helpful to understand how behavior changes when people merge together into an individual mentality free of any sort of prejudice among its members, Freud also cites various authors to give us different approaches to the masses (Gustave le bon, most. Start by marking “Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego” as Want to Read: Error rating book. Very interesting because this analysis of the group as a whole in all sorts of aspects makes it seem like the group is a character of its own with a own personality and rational to make decisions that apply right across the board to any sort of group at any particular time(A group will. Did he get it all right? .). The only different part was, the example that each one gave to support his idea. He starts his investigation by reviewing the work of Gustave LeBon (The Psychology of Crowds), William McDougall (The Group Mind) and William Trotter (Instincts of the Herd in Peace and War), praising their (especially LeBon’s) keen observation of crowd behavio. a simple and interesting way of explaining human psychology.Sometimes his thoughts are edgy but still makes a lot of good points. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, 1921; The Ego and the ID, 1923; The Question of Lay Analysis, 1926; The Future of an Illusion, 1927; Civilization and Its Discontents, 1930; Moses and Monotheism, 1939; Quotes of Sigmund Freud ; Biograhpy of Sigmund Freud ; Free Ebooks of Sigmund Freud. Refresh and try again. An fascinating and eye opening first chapter that actually breaks down what is group psychology and what are the differences between individual psychology and the differences between the group and the individual. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego (1921) by Freud. Freud discusses his, Usually there’s a point in Freud’s essays where he’ll fiat some flatly incorrect premise, and then rush past in hopes you won’t notice. "MOses and Monotheism", "Totem and Taboo", "Civilization and Its Discontents" are all recapped and metabolized in this book. by W.W. Norton & Company. Of course there's a whole bunch of sexual stuff having to do with Oedipus and wanting to kill your father and have sex with your mother, weird, ancient greek myth type stuff, and all that, but why don't I just spare you the pain.
Here it comes in identifying a ‘leader’ as an essential pre-condition of the ‘group/herd’, which brings us back to his father-as-first-sacrifice thesis which he articulates in Moses and Monotheism, but sidesteps the most fascinating aspect of group psychology; namely, that it often operates without any such patriarch, but as a faceless, blameless mass, giving v. Usually there’s a point in Freud’s essays where he’ll fiat some flatly incorrect premise, and then rush past in hopes you won’t notice. A detailed yet a comprehensive read. Most if not everyone has at least a vague idea who Sigmund Freud is. Our one defining definition of the individual as a component of the group. So, while someone talked about the marriage, others explained the financial companies. Free kindle book and epub digitized and proofread by Project Gutenberg.

Freud offers some interesting observations about group psychology and a decent summary of the research up to his time, but undermines it by trying to explain it all according to his theory of the libido, which at times seems like a decent explanation, but at others gives way to hammer-and-nail syndrome (when all you have is a hammer . While I enjoyed reading this book due to all the detailed explanations of how humans behave In groups , j would have preferred that Freud toned down a bit his usual “humans are driven by their sexual desires”. We get to understand how the behavior changes when within a group. . Freud's early style has lost its usual magic in this book especially, and what came across as quaintly charming balderdash in Totem and Taboo seems tiresomely absurd here. I am perhaps more versed in psychology than the average guy on the street but plenty of this was straight whoosh, over my head. But affected by news, my beloved colleague said desperately : “ of course the (Muslim Brotherhood), all this stupidity was there since 1928, could you imagine that?? A must read. I thought it was going to help me see the idiocy of crowds in a more enlightening way. It was very interesting, Freud shows the mass of the psychology very well with all constituent parts such as ego, ideal ego, suggestion and libido, love and identification and also mob mentality. Sometimes dead on; sometimes the seeds of further warranted discourse that ultimately drive thought forward. Here it comes in identifying a ‘leader’ as an essential pre-condition of the ‘group/herd’, which brings us back to his father-as-first-sacrifice thesis which he articulates in Moses and Monotheism, but sidesteps the most fascinating aspect of group psychology; namely, that it often operates without any such patriarch, but as a faceless, blameless mass, giving vent to the sublimated desires of each individual. Like Le Bon, Freud says that as part of the mass, the individual acquires a sense of infinite power which allows him to act on impulses that he would otherwise have to curb as an isolated individual. A lot of Freud has been discredited, but I enjoy some of his reasoning on certain things. And because she bestowed me a new question, I think I owe her an answer too!!. Though if you are going into a book by Freud with those expectations...there is probably something "off" about you. And I used to manage this mental situation by asking almost everyone around me for a convincing answer which I don’t interested in as much I do to drifting my mind away from the question itself. The question he addresses here is, What are the emotional bonds that hold collective entities, such as an army and a church, together? That people in crowds are a lot less rational. The Silly questions easily find its way to haunting my mind for days. Most if not everyone has at least a vague idea who Sigmund Freud is. Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego. Indeed, it's rather misleading. To see what your friends thought of this book, Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego, Over the last few years, I have pondered the dynamics of group psychology.

Indeed, it's. And I used to manage this mental situation by asking almost everyone around me for a convincing answer which I don’t interested in as much I do to drifting my mind away from the question itself. A group in naturally more conservative as opposed to progressive. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XVIII (1920-1922): Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Group Psychology and Other Works, 65-144 Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego Sigmund Freud This Page Left Intentionally Blank WARNING! My first Freud book, and now I am no longer intimidated next time one is assigned! Group psychology and analysis of the ego turned out to be such a valuable book. It is a fruitful question, and Freud offers some interesting answers.

widely translated Freud A … . In fact, I purchased this book some months ago and left it on my shelf because, I was missing the energy to start it. Like Le Bon, Freud says that as part of, In this monograph, Freud describes psychological mechanisms at work within mass movements. But generally speaking, this book is very helpful to understand how behavior changes when people merge together into an individual mentality free of any sort of prejudice among its members, Freud also cites various authors to give us different approaches to the masses (Gustave le bon, most noticeably) ... if you’re getting started into psychoanalysis you’ll really enjoy this book. In other words, the group actions may be unthinkable to an individual; nevertheless, the event happened when they all participated as a group.

Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of, Published Freud agrees with the theories of this sociologist, known as Le Bon.

.). Definitely worth reading. It turned out to be everything the title says it is and much more. The last week’s question was: if any project was losing all possible success characters but kept only one of them that obliged you to still call it “successful” , what would it be??. Sigmund Freud, Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego