Now, we will discuss the three types of veto powers that the President of India enjoys. The reform process is hampered by the insistence on an increase in the number of permanent seats, he said, adding that the veto power only serves the national interests of the States that hold it. A. ALOTAIBI (Kuwait), speaking on behalf of the Arab Group, said the United Nations is undergoing a sweeping reform process to better position itself to meet international challenges. It must also lead to improvements in the Council’s working methods and gradual approval of its rules of procedure, so that they are no longer provisional. He called for an increase in public Council meetings and said all United Nations entities must uphold their respective mandates. RODRIGO A. CARAZO (Costa Rica) said reform must be based on consensus and the principles of democracy and inclusiveness.
Qatar will continue to support comprehensive reform that renders the Council more inclusive and effective. SHARES. “We must learn from the past mistakes of intergovernmental negotiations,” she added. Pyongyang “strongly opposes” Japan’s pursuit of a permanent seat, as that country has committed war crimes. He reaffirmed the position that the enlarged Council must be composed of no less than 26 members and Africa must retain the responsibility to select its candidate. The Council will be more representative and responsive if reforms increase the number of elected seats and the possibility of all Member States to serve in the organ. If you have any more doubts just ask here on the forum and our experts will try to help you out as soon as possible. In addition, a stalemate in the Council on many key issues and a glaring failure to maintain international peace and security is largely attributed to its present configuration. He called for the abolishment of the present form of the veto. Africa has no representation in the permanent category, the core decision‑making unit of the Council.
RODNEY M. HUNTER (United States) said his country supports a “modest expansion” of the Council in the permanent and non‑permanent categories. Intergovernmental negotiations have allowed for broad commonalities to emerge among States, he said, calling for increased efforts to reach a compromised solution and to create a more representative Council. He called for all regions to be adequately represented in permanent and non‑permanent positions in the Council, including at least one additional non‑permanent seat for the Eastern European Group. That must be the point of departure for Council reform efforts, she said, referring to the reform process as “a true expression of our commitment to the fundamentals of multilateralism”. The three types of veto powers that the President of India enjoys, they are: Absolute Veto. Calling for an early move to text‑based negotiations, she said Ireland is willing to consider any model capable of commanding sufficient consensus. VICTOR MORARU (Republic of Moldova) stressed that the Council must better reflect today’s world, which means more representation for Africa, Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe. While creating new permanent seats has not been her delegation’s preferred model, Ireland would agree if such a proposal earns sufficient support. The Group of Four, while having a common position, are also respectful of different perspectives in this process. TALAL RASHID N. M. AL-KHALIFA (Qatar), associating himself with the Arab Group, said increasing international challenges in peace and security continue to compel Member States to propose reforms to improve the Council. Multilateralism and inclusiveness will only strengthen the work of the United Nations and its organs. Africa will continue to advocate for meaningful reform that will make the Security Council more responsive to present and emerging challenges. The United Nations must not only act on behalf of Member States, but it must also act for them, she said, adding that for the Organization to be credible it must represent and reflect the interests of all Member States. France wants the Council to account for the needs of new powers and supports the candidacy of Brazil, Germany, India and Japan as permanent members alongside the increased representation of African States in permanent and non‑permanent positions. Multilateralism is weakened when the organ that represents the epitome of that notion is defective, he noted, saying that the United Nations of today does not reflect current realities. Expressing concern that even after a decade of intergovernmental negotiations Member States still do not even have a text to negotiate on, he said such an absence impairs the ability of those States to move forward. “Consideration of new permanent membership must consider candidates’ ability and willingness to contribute to the maintenance of international peace and security,” he said, noting that the United States opposes any change to the veto. “As the Council acts on behalf of all Member States, it should therefore remain accountable to all States,” he said. Member States must not be constrained in their planning.
“It is high time to offer real prospects to underrepresented groups of States and regions in the Council,” she concluded. However, divergence in the positions of Member States and interest groups on reform models continue to challenge progress on building consensus on all five clusters of the intergovernmental negotiations. He called for adequate representation for different regional blocs and voiced support for restraints on the use of the veto in cases related to grave crimes under international law. As such, his delegation welcomes a more equitable representation in the Council. document.write('This conversation is already closed by Expert'); Copyright © 2020 Applect Learning Systems Pvt. “Attempts to set artificial timelines and arbitrarily launch text‑based negotiations will undermine unity and have a negative impact on the contributions of small States,” he warned. The next session should begin with a debate on the document “Revised Elements of Commonality and Issues for Further Consideration”, based on the outcome papers of previous sessions, as well as interventions from the floor. For negotiations to be meaningful, it is crucial to list the various aspects of different positions, which will be especially critical when working on a text for negotiations. “The use of the veto reflects the pure political interests of permanent Council members,” he said. The British Queen and her son Prince Charles enjoy a veto power, by which they can annul any new laws being drafted against their interest in the government, it has been revealed. Expanded membership must include permanent and non‑permanent categories, and small island developing States should not be excluded due to their size. Meanwhile, such countries should not have to spend a fortune to become elected. CHO TAE-YUL (Republic of Korea), associating himself with the Uniting for Consensus group, said that expanding the Council to a size bigger than the mid‑20s will seriously affect its impact. “The United Nations capacity to address current global challenges largely depends on the political will to move forward with Security Council reform,” he concluded. Reform of the Council is within the purview of the Assembly, he said, highlighting decisions made to pursue informal consultations on the matter. Improvement in multilateralism will not be achieved through an increase of the number of the “haves”, he warned, pointing out that his group presented a complete model which is egalitarian, comprehensive and rectifying in approach, and one that aims to counterbalance the weight of the permanent five members of the Security Council. MODEST JONATHAN MERO (United Republic of Tanzania), associating himself with the African Group, voiced concern over the slow pace of the reform process and over his continent’s underrepresentation in the Council. Absolute Veto means that by using this power the President of India can withhold his approval to any bill which has been passed by the parliament. “The world has changed but the Council’s composition has not responded to that change,” he noted, asserting that the principal organ for the maintenance of peace and security must represent the world it seeks to protect. It is imperative to take the next step of commencing negotiations in good faith. Share Tweet Share Email Print. More discussions on the matter are needed. In its current form, the Council is ill‑suited to effectively address twenty‑first century challenges. At the same time, her delegation is ready to examine all practical proposals aiming for interim solutions. ALI NASEER MOHAMED (Maldives) said that a reformed Council should have more permanent members to reflect current political and economic realities.